Michael Barth, et ux. v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., et al.

Whether dismissing the case on jurisdictional grounds without jurisdictional discovery is in conflict with the decisions of other Circuits where the 3rd Circuit as well as the 2nd, 5th, 6th and 7th Circuits have established a standard which requires that facts demonstrating jurisdiction be shown before a plaintiff has the right to take discovery, while the 1st, 4th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th Circuits permit a plaintiff to take jurisdictional discovery and such discovery is not discretionary and the District of Columbia Circuit permits discovery when a party has failed to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction, requires this Court to rule the appropriate criteria to determine the important on question of whether jurisdictional discovery should be permitted following a Motion to Dismiss under Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (b)(2) so that there will be uniformity amongst the Circuits? (Suggested answer in the affirmative)