Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pacetta, LLC, et al. v. Town of Ponce Inlet, Florida
Paid petition · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, No. 5D14-4520 · judgment June 16, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Is a regulatory takings claim ripe for review when the local government has made clear how it would apply land use regulations to the property at issue, or must a property owner submit multiple applications even when those applications are not necessary to prove that the local government would reject all economically viable development applications?
-
Does government effect a taking when it intentionally devalues private property because it plans to later purchase the property at a discount?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Christina Marie Martin
Christina M. Martin
For respondent
Elliot H. Scherker
Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et. al. GRANTED.
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Aug 08 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Aug 03 2018Reply of Pacetta, LLC, et al. not accepted for filing. (August 07, 2018)(Electronic Version to be Resubmitted)
- Aug 03 2018Reply of petitioners Pacetta, LLC, et al. filed.
- Jul 25 2018Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et al.
- Jul 24 2018Response to petition from respondent Town of Ponce Inlet filed.
- Jun 21 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2018)
- Mar 20 2018Application (17A996) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 21, 2018.
- Mar 14 2018Application (17A996) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 23, 2018 to June 21, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.