Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Martyn Baylay v. Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 16-4113, 17-1958 · judgment February 7, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
-
Does the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act permit adjudication of claims against a “foreign state” (as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1603(a)) outside of federal and state courts?
-
In drafting the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, did Congress intend to create a two-stage process for a claimant to pursue his claim for work-related injuries when his employer is a “foreign state” and the state where the injury occurred has state agency that adjudicates such claims?
-
May the executive branch of the government of the State of Illinois (i.e., Industrial Commission of Illinois) exercise authority/jurisdiction to decide a claim against a “foreign state”, and its agencies and instrumentalities, when Congress, in enacting the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, transferred all issues related to a foreign state’s immunity (or any waiver thereof) to the judiciary and away from the executive branch of government.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Craig Michael Sandberg
Muslin & Sandberg
For respondent
Martin B. Carroll
Fox Swibel Levin & Carroll LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 18 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jul 10 2018Waiver of right of respondent Etihad Airways P.J.S.C. to respond filed.
- Jun 05 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2018)