Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ian Ornstein v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 16-0220 · judgment April 20, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Is Wrongful Foreclosure a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and, if so, how can a wrongfully foreclosed homeowner have his unlawfully removed rights and possessions restored with the minimum of further emotional distress and, if so, to what exemplary degree should the wrongfully foreclosing entity be sanctioned, and ordered to pay punitive damages? Does a lender or creditor have the right to foreclose on a citizen's home if the lender has violated 15 U.S.C. 1638(f), and 15 U.S.C. 1639c(h), inter alia? i_I.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ian Ornstein
For respondent
C. Bradley Vynalek
Quarles & Brady LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jun 13 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 08 2018Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A. to respond filed.
- May 30 2018Waiver of right of respondents Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bank of New York Mellon to respond filed.
- Jan 13 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2018)