Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Weed v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 16-2120 · judgment October 6, 2017
Before the decision, about 2.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a First Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Questions presented
-
Whether a court can invoke an executive agency’s reading of a statute to declare conduct criminal, without asking whether that reading is correct.
-
Whether the constructive amendment of an indictment—an error this Court has held is “far too serious” to be “dismissed as harmless error”—should be presumed prejudicial for purposes of plain-error review. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey Alan Lamken
MoloLamken LLP
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Proceedings
- May 14 2018Petition DENIED.
- Apr 25 2018Motion of Cause of Action Institute for leave to file amicus brief not accepted for filing. (April 25, 2018)
- Apr 24 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.
- Apr 18 2018Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Apr 13 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 14, 2018)
- Jan 31 2018Application (17A808) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until April 13, 2018.
- Jan 30 2018Application (17A808) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 13, 2018 to April 13, 2018, submitted to Justice Breyer.