Terry Lee West v. Minnesota

Were Appellant's Miranda rights violated when he was questioned while in custody, without being given his Miranda rights? Further, Appellant was questioned after having counsel appointed, without his counsel present. The trial court initially suppressed one of the statements but subsequently changed its own ruling and allowed all but the most flagrant violation/evidence to be used by the state. Were Appellant's Fourth Amendment rights violated when the trial court upheld the faulty warrant? Did the trial court err by allowing the prior testimony of Appellant into evidence at the second trial? IV Did the trial court err by allowing exhibits/recording taken by the informant into evidence without testimony from the informant? Did the trial court err in finding Appellant guilty based upon inadmissible evidence? Did the trial court err when finding that the firearms enhancement of MSA § 609.11 applied to Appellant? Did the Trial Court Abuse its Discretion and Prejudice Appellant's Case by Denying the Defense the Ability to Have the Expert Witness Testify?