Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Salam S. Zora v. Thomas Winn, Warden
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 17-1132 · judgment September 5, 2017
Certiorari denied · June 11, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The question presented in this case is: Whether, in light of Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982), the doctrine of implied bias still exists and what the appropriate remedy is where there is juror bias during the body of a criminal trial (not during voir dire or jury deliberation).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mayer Morganroth
Morganroth & Morganroth, PLLC
For respondent
Aaron David Lindstrom
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 11 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 22 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.
- May 10 2018Waiver of right of respondent Warden Winn to respond filed.
- Apr 09 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 11, 2018)