Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Vaughn Hoeflin Standley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1691 · judgment November 13, 2017


Certiorari denied · May 29, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Must a government employee allege the quantifiability or likelihood of harm to public health and safety to have a disclosure protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act? If an agency publicly espoused its belief that it was covered by a law, would not that make an employee's belief of the same reasonable under the Whistleblower Protection Act? Given that the National Nuclear Security Administration spent Defense funds authorized it in the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, would not that make it legally accountable to directives in the Act? (i)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Vaughn H. Standley

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 29 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 08 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.
  3. Apr 30 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board to respond filed.
  4. Mar 30 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 2, 2018)