Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Vaughn Hoeflin Standley v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1691 · judgment November 13, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Must a government employee allege the quantifiability or likelihood of harm to public health and safety to have a disclosure protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act? If an agency publicly espoused its belief that it was covered by a law, would not that make an employee's belief of the same reasonable under the Whistleblower Protection Act? Given that the National Nuclear Security Administration spent Defense funds authorized it in the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, would not that make it legally accountable to directives in the Act? (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Vaughn H. Standley
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 29 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 08 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.
- Apr 30 2018Waiver of right of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board to respond filed.
- Mar 30 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 2, 2018)