Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, No. C070512 · judgment September 15, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. 2701–2721, contracts for the management of casino-style Indian gaming activity must be approved by the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission. See id. §§ 2710(d)(9), 2711(a)(1). The Act provides that, for purposes of this requirement, a management contract “shall be considered to include all collateral agreements to such contract that relate to the gaming activity.” Id. § 2711(a)(3). An implementing regulation provides that a “management contract” encompasses a collateral agreement “if such contract or agreement provides for the management of all or part of a gaming operation.” 25 C.F.R. 502.15. The question presented is: Whether a collateral agreement to a management contract for an Indian gaming operation is subject to approval by the National Indian Gaming Commission only if the collateral agreement itself provides for management of all or part of the operation.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Daniel H. Bromberg
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
For respondent
Paula M. Yost
Dentons US LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 25 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jun 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.
- Jun 05 2018Reply of petitioner Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
- May 22 2018Brief of respondent Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians in opposition filed.
- Apr 16 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2018.
- Apr 13 2018Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. filed.
- Apr 12 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 23, 2018 to May 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Mar 19 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2018)