Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Angela Borrell v. Arthur F. Richer, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 15-2823, 16-3837, 16-3959 · judgment August 30, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause governs state action. 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moreover, renders liable those who violate constitutional rights “under color of” law. In the Second and Eighth Circuits, demonstrating that public and private entities have engaged in “joint action” or are “pervasively entwined” is a sufficient basis to render the resulting conduct state action. The Third Circuit, however, disagrees. It holds that, notwithstanding “joint action” or “pervasive entwinement” between public and private, the Constitution applies only when the state directly coerced the conduct at issue. The question presented is: Whether “joint activity” or “pervasive entwinement” between a public and private entity is a sufficient basis to demonstrate that resulting conduct is state action.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes
McDermott Will & Emery
For respondent
John Bartley DeLone
Attorney General's Office
Proceedings
- May 21 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 01 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018.
- Apr 30 2018Reply of petitioner Angela Borrell filed.
- Apr 16 2018Brief of respondents Geisinger Medical Center, et al. in opposition filed.
- Apr 13 2018Waiver of right of respondents Bloomsburg University and Michelle Ficca to respond filed.
- Mar 08 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 16, 2018)
- Jan 24 2018Application (17A777) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 9, 2018.
- Jan 22 2018Application (17A777) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 7, 2018 to April 6, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.