Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
OpenRisk, LLC v. MicroStrategy Services Corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 16-1852, 16-1906 · judgment November 13, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under § 301 of the Copyright Act of 1976, “all legal or equitable rights that are equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright as specified by section 106 in works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression and come within the subject matter of copyright as specified by sections 102 and 103, whether created before or after that date and whether published or unpublished, are governed exclusively by this title.” This Court held in Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985) and the Fifth Circuit’s held in United States v. Smith, 686 F. 2d 234 (1982), that copyright infringement does not equate to theft under the National Stolen Property Act § 2314. The question presented here is: Whether the Fourth Circuit erroneously held, in conflict with decisions of this Court in Dowling and the Fifth Circuit in Smith, that § 301 of the Copyright Act of 1976 preempts claims of theft, more specifically Virginia state law claims of embezzlement and larceny.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Francis Gilbert Gleason Jr.
Gleason & Gleason, P.C.
For respondent
Kathryn Schaefer Zecca
Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sa
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 16 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.
- Mar 26 2018Waiver of right of respondent MICROSTRATEGY SERVICES CORPORATION to respond filed.
- Mar 12 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2018)