Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ronald Goldberg, et al. v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 16-3032 · judgment January 31, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
For 26 U.S.C. § 7433(a), is the assessment of a tax an activity “in connection with” the collection of that tax? 26 U.S.C. § 7433(a) provides: If, in connection with any collection of Federal tax with respect to a taxpayer, any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of this title, or any regulation promulgated under this title, such taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States. Except as provided in section 7432, such civil action shall be the exclusive remedy for recovering damages resulting from such actions.
-
Under the informal-claim doctrine, must a taxpayer who files a suit contesting a tax under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 after the statute of limitations has expired file a formal, amended claim before suit is filed?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Wilson Hepplewhite
David W. Hepplewhite, P.C.
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 16 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.
- Mar 20 2018Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
- Feb 28 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2018)