Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Melisa Singh v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 15-2901 · judgment September 28, 2017
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
Nearly 97 percent of all federal convictions are the result of guilty pleas. When forfeiture is sought in those cases, the right of third party property owners to challenge the forfeitability of their property is dependent on the circuit in which the case is prosecuted. There is a sharp divide among the circuits on this issue. Some courts recognize the due process and property rights of third party petitioners in this regard, while others, including the Third Circuit, do not. The question presented is: Whether a third party property owner is permitted to challenge the lawfulness of the forfeiture of his or her property in a criminal proceeding, particularly where the sole basis for the forfeiture is the defendant’s plea and consent forfeiture agreement.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Steven Leigh Kessler
Law Offices of Steven L. Kessler
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 04 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 15 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.
- May 15 2018Reply of petitioner Melisa Singh filed. (Distributed)
- Apr 30 2018Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Mar 21 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2018.
- Mar 20 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2018 to April 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Feb 23 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2018)