Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George Pieczenik v. Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 16-3579 · judgment November 2, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether, in accordance with this Court's decision in Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159, 164 (1970) a tenant has standing to challenge an administrative consent order even though the tenant was not a party to the order because the order was entered into by his landlord and impacts his use of the property. Whether the determination of the time in which a defendant must respond to a summons and complaint is a judicial function or a ministerial function that may be delegated to the clerk's office of the district court. Whether a district court may, by local rule, delegate a judicial function to the clerk's office of the district court.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George Pieczenik
For respondent
Matthew D. Knoblauch
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 19 2018Petition DENIED.
- Feb 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.
- Feb 08 2018Waiver of right of respondents Comm'r., NJ Dept. of Eviron. Protection, et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 23 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2018)