Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Bobbette M. Blake v. MJ Optical, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 16-3100 · judgment August 31, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether the District Court and the Eighth Circuit erred by imposing on plaintiff the element of “reporting sexual harassment” to management rather than considering the “reporting harassment” as part of the employer’s affirmative defense in Faragher Ellerth, which is available only to those employers who have anti-harassment policies and procedures in place. Whether the District Court and the Eighth Circuit erred by concluding that Ms. Blake was required to report any harassment by the Vice President of Operations who was the highest-ranking management member present at the Company premises on a daily basis. Whether the District Court and the Eighth Circuit erred by concluding that Ms. Blake’s failure to report sexual harassment by the Vice President of Operations constituted an “invitation” where the Company had neither a Company policy or Handbook providing guidance on reporting such harassment or a Human Resources Department or representative.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Terry Ann White
Carlson & Burnett
For respondent
Patrick Joseph Barrett
Fraser Stryker, PC LLO
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 02 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 13 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.
- Feb 22 2018Brief of respondent MJ Optical, Inc. in opposition filed.
- Jan 16 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2018)