# No. 16-1017 No. 16-1017 · Decided June 22, 2018 > Prepared by Supreme Court Report from the PDF published by the Supreme Court of the United States. The PDF is the authoritative text; this copy can contain errors of conversion. Source: ## Syllabus Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 76 M. J. 64; 76 M. J. 54. \* Together with *Craig* v. *United States*, *Lewis* v. *United States*, *Miller* v. *United States*, *Morchinek* v. *United States*, and *O’Shaughnessy* v. *United States* (see this Court’s Rule 12.4)*,* also on certiorari to the same court. ## Counsel *Stephen I. Vladeck* argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were *Mary J. Bradley*, *Christopher D. Carrier*, *Brian L. Mizer*, *Johnathan D. Legg*, *Lauren-Ann L. Shure*, and *Eugene R. Fidell*. *Aditya Bamzai, pro se,* argued the cause as *amicus curiae* in support of neither party. With him on the brief was *Adam J. White.* *Brian H. Fletcher* argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were *Solicitor General Francisco, Acting Assistant Attorney General Boente, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, Joseph F. Palmer,* and *Danielle S. Tarin*. ## Per Curiam *Per Curiam.* The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. *It is so ordered.*